About Us

Employment Lawyer Discusses what Trump Offer to Federal Employees to Resign Would Do

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST: Federal employees have till February 6 to choose whether to willingly leave their jobs. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, informed workers on Tuesday that if they hand in their resignation by next Thursday – that’s less than a week from now – most will be allowed to depart and be paid up until completion of September. Michelle Bercovici is an who represents federal staff members as a big part of her practice, so I asked her for her analysis about what OPM’s deferred resignation program would in fact mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I in fact do not consider it a lot an offer. I think it’s a demand to resign with a vague promise that, potentially, you could be kept in administrative leave status for as much as 8 months – but no guarantees.MARTIN: Some people have actually been utilizing the term buyout to describe what this is due to the fact that there seems to be the deal of administrative leave for as much as 8 months if you take this deal. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would never explain it as a buyout. I think that’s an extremely misleading term to utilize in this situation. When you believe of a buyout, there’s generally some sort of written contract or a concrete deal to offer a benefit in exchange for waiving particular rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: If customers ask you for your guidance, what are you informing them?BERCOVICI: First thing we tell them is workout extreme care. There are no guarantees included in this email. The only thing I can tell you for certain is that if you alter your mind, the agency’s most likely not going to let you withdraw that resignation, and employment you are essentially quiting control over a lot.MARTIN: Exists some classification of staff member who you think this might benefit? Maybe they’re close to retirement. Is somebody like that may this be an attractive offer?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement require to be the most mindful because leaving earlier than intended can have major effects, possibly, on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me simply play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She told press reporters that this is a great deal for individuals who don’t wish to return to the workplace. Let me just play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is a recommendation to federal workers that they need to return in – to work. And if they do not, then they have the option to resign, and this administration is very kindly using to pay them for 8 months.MARTIN: employment You’re shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: It simply – in a manner, it breaks my heart that federal workers are being jerked around like this. It sends out a signal to me that this return-to-office order remains in bad faith, that it’s created to get folks who work really hard to resign. I believe it’s attempting to pull the wool over a great deal of individuals’s eyes since there are no assurances. And these are individuals who love their job. They enjoy the mission of the agency. They strive. And employment today, they’re facing extremely tough choices, especially if they’re remote. I mean, employment it’s really coercive.MARTIN: You state it’s coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially, if you’re someone who resides in Oregon and has been told to report to D.C. otherwise we’re going to fire you, they might feel that they have no option than to take this option.MARTIN: Do you prepare for legal challenges just to the deal itself? And if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This deal, to be honest, is so unprecedented that I think a lot of us are still attempting to determine what to do with it. I’m not exactly sure if the deal itself may be challengeable. I think the larger question is the execution of these terms. I’m not familiar with any authority that exists today for OPM to buy companies to provide this number of people administrative leave. So I believe it is extremely much possibly setting the stage for obstacles due to the fact that I feel OPM has actually greatly surpassed their authority.MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is a work attorney with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you a lot for signing up with us.BERCOVICI: Thank you so much for having me here.

Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights scheduled. Visit our site terms of use and consents pages at www.npr.org for additional information.

NPR transcripts are developed on a rush deadline by an NPR contractor. This text may not remain in its final form and might be updated or modified in the future. Accuracy and accessibility may differ. The reliable record of NPR’s programs is the audio record.